1. Perez-Gomez I, Giles T. European survey of contact lens wearers and eye care professionals on satisfaction with a new water gradient disposable contact lens. Clin Optom. 2014;6:17-23.
  2. Angelini TE, Nixon RM, Dunn AC, et al. Viscoelasticity and mesh-size at the surface of hydrogels characterized with microrheology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:E-abstract 500.
  3. Thekveli S, Qui Y, Kapoor Y, et al. Structure-property relationship of delefilcon A lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2012;35(suppl 1):e14.
  4. Belda-Salmerón L, Ferrer-Blasco T, Albarrán-Diego C, Madrid-Costa D, Montés-Micó R. Diurnal variations in visual performance for disposable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(7):682-690.
  5. Montés-Micó R, Belda-Salmerón L, Ferrer-Blasco T, Albarrán-Diego C, García-Lázaro S. On-eye optical quality of daily disposable contact lenses for different wearing times. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013;33(5):581-591.
  6. In a clinical trial to assess overall performance of DAILIES TOTAL1™ for Astigmatism lenses where n=134 patients; Alcon data on file, 2021. Available on request.
  7. Eiden SB, Davis R, Bergenske P. Prospective study of lotrafilcon B lenses comparing 2 vrsus 4 weeks of wear for objective and subjective measures of health, comfort, and vision. Eye Contact Lens. 2013;39(4):290-294.
  8. In a clinical trial to evaluate stability of axis orientation of DAILIES TOTAL1™ for Astigmatism lenses where n=47; Alcon data on file, 2020. Available on request.
  9. Bergenske P et al. Long term clinical results: 3 years of up to 30 nights continuous wear of lotrafilcon A and daily wear of low-Dk/t hydroge lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33(2):74-80.
  10. Alcon data on file, 2008. Ex vivo total cholesterol & total protein analysis of commercially available silicone hydrogel lenses. Available on request.
  11. Nash W, Gabriel M, Mowrey-McKee M. A comparison of various silicone hydrogel lenses; lipid and protein deposition as a result of daily wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87: E-abstract 105110.
  12. Nash WL, Gabriel MM. Ex vivo analysis of cholesterol deposition for commercially available silicone hydrogel contact lenses using a fluorometric enzymatic assay. Eye Contact Lens. 2014;40(5):277-282.
  13. Merchea M, Evans D, Kannarr S, et al. Patient and ECP Satisfaction in the United States with a Novel Water Gradient Daily Disposable Multifocal Contact Lens. Presented at the American Optometric Association Annual Meeting, June 20-24, 2018. Denver, CO.
  14. Lemp J, Kern J. Alcon multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia correction. Paper presented at the Canadian Association of Optometrists Congress; June 28-30, 2017; Ottawa, ON.
  15. Alcon data on file, 2016. Alcon Multifocal Precision Profile Contact Lens Design. Available on request.
  16. Based on in vitro measurement of thickness profiles on unworn lenses; Alcon data on file, 2019. Available on request.
  17. Pitt WG, Jack DR, Zhao Y, Nelson JL, Pruitt JD. Loading and release of a phospholipid from contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88(4):502-506.
  18. Lemp J, Kern J. On-eye performance of lotrafilcon B lenses packaged with a substantive wetting agent. Presented at the American Optometric Association Annual Meeting, June 21-25, 2017. Washington, D.C.
  19. Alcon data on file, 2015. In vitro biological deposition comparison of Air Optix. Available on request
  20. Alcon data on file, 2008. Ex vivo total cholesterol & total protein analysis of commercially available silicone hydrogel lenses. Available on request
  21. Muya L, Lemp J, Kern JR, Sentell KB, Lane J, Perry SS. Impact of packaging saline wetting agents on wetting substantivity and lubricity. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:E-abstract 1463.
  22. Tucker R, Lemp J, Guillon M. In vitro and on eye wettability of lotrafilcon B lenses packaged with a substantive wetting agent. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(8):3070.
  23. Luensmann D, Yu M, Yang J, Srinivasan S, Jones L. Impact of Cosmetics on the Physical Dimension and Optical Performance of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses. Eye & Contact Lens. 2015;4(4):218-227.
  24. Srinivasan S, Otchere H, Yu M, Yang J, Luensmann D, Jones L. Impact of Cosmetics on the surface properties of silicone hydrogen contact lenses. Eye & Contact Lens. 2015;41(4):228-235.
  25. Luensmann D, van Doorn K, May C, Srinivasan S, Jones L. Physical Dimension and Optical Assessment of Currently Marketed Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses After Exposure to Cosmetics. American Academy of Optometry, San Antonio, USA, 2018.
  26. Based on a 30-day clinical study of 75 habitual lotrafilcon B lens wearers; Alcon data on file, 2017.
  27. Lemp J, Kern J. A comparison of real time and recall comfort assessments. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93:Eabstract 165256.
  28. Lally J et al. A new lens care solution provides moisture and comfort with today’s CLs. Optician 2011;241(6296):42-46.
  29. Alcon data on file, 2014. In vitro wetting analysis: out‐of‐pack and wetting substantivity.
  30. Based on a 30-day clinical study of 75 habitual lotrafilcon B lens wearers; Alcon data on file, 2017.
  31. Pruitt J, Lindley K, Winterton L. Triple-action moisturizers for increased comfort in daily disposable lenses. Optician. November 17, 2007:27-28.
  32. Wolffsohn JS, Hunt OA, Chowdhury A. Objective clinical performance of ‘comfort-enhanced’ daily disposable soft contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010:33(2):88-92.
  33. Kern J, Wang C. Performance evaluation of DAILIES AquaComfort Plus Toric Contact Lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:ARVO E-Abstract 3047.
  34. Marx S, Muller C, Sickenberger W. Subjective pre -lens tear film stability of daily disposable contact lenses using ring mire projection. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2015;38:eS.
  35. Alcon data on file, 2019. A01660-REP-044605 v2 Precision1 Lens with Smart Surface. Available on request
  36. Alcon data on file, 2020. Clinical Performance of a Daily Disposable Toric Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens [CLA306-C003] n=78 eyes.
  37. Based on in vitro measurement of unworn lenses. PRECISION1™ (DDT2) Lens with Smart Surface study; Alcon data on file, 2019.
  38. Tucker B, Leveillee E, Bauman E, Subbaraman L. Characterization of the Surface Properties of a Novel Daily Disposable Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens. Poster presented at the American Academy of Optometry Annual Conference, October 23-26; Orlando FL.
  39. IDDrop Comparative Study DACP and BioTrue ONEday Report; Alcon data on file, 2019. 35.
  40. IDDrop Comparative Study Oasys 1 Day and TruEye; Alcon data on file, 2019.
  41. Cummings S, Giedd B, Pearson C. Clinical performance of a new daily disposable spherical contact lens. Optom Vis Sci. 2019;96:Eabstract 195375.
  42. Alcon data on file, 2021. In a clinical trial to assess comfort and vision over 16 hours of wear with PRECISION1™ sphere contact lenses where n=35. [IIT #59917981].
  43. Alcon data on file, 2021. In a clinical trial to assess comfort and vision over 16 hours of wear with PRECISION1™ for Astigmatism contact lenses where n=30. [IIT #64882539].
  44. Silverstein et al. Symptom Relief Following a Single Dose of Propylene Glycol-Hydroxypropyl Guar. Clinical Ophthalmology 2020:14 3167-3177
  45. Ketelson H, Rangarajan R; Pre-clinical evaluation of a novel phospholipid nanoemulsion based lubricant eye drops. Poster presented at ARVO 2017
  46. Christensen M, Martin A, Meadows D. An evaluation of the efficacy and patient acceptance of a new lubricant eye gel. The American Academy of Optometry Annual Meeting; 2011; E-Abstract 115013.
  47. Cohen S, et al. Evaluation of clinical outcomes in patients with dry eye disease using lubricant eye drops containing polyethylene glycol or carboxymethylcellulose. Clin Ophtalmology. 2014;8:157-164
  48. Systane Gel Drops Product Information - Package Insert.
  49. Rangarajan R, Kraybill B, Ogundele A, Ketelson H. Effects of a Hyaluronic Acid/Hydroxypropyl Guar Artificial Tear Solution on Protection, Recovery, and Lubricity in Models of Corneal Epithelium. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015;31(8):491-497.
  50. Davitt, WF, Bloomenstein M, Christensen M, Martin AE. Efficacy in patients with dry eye after treatment with a new lubricant eye drop formulation. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2010;26(4):347-353.
  51. Rolando M, Autori S, Badino F, Barabino S. Protecting the ocular surface and improving the quality of life of dry eye patients: a study of the efficacy of an HP-guar containing ocular lubricant in a population of dry eye patients. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2009;25(3):271-278.
  52. Christensen MT et al. A comparison of efficacy between Systane Ultra and Optive lubricant eye drops when rested with dry eye patients. Optometry. 2009;80(67):315.
  53. Jack V. Greiner et al. Clin Ther. 27(5): 568-577, 2005 (Sponsored by Pfizer).
  54. Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (ASCIA), Allergic Conjunctivitis, 2019.
  55. Australia and New Zealand Naphcon®-A product information.
  56. Benelli U. Systane lubricant eye drops in the management of ocular dryness. Clinical Opthalmology. 2011:5, 783-790.
  57. Alcon data on file, 2014. Clinical evaluation of the safety and efficacy of FID 120947A compared to a marketed lens care solution in Gas Permeable Contact Lens Wearers. Available on request.
  58. Muya L, Scott A, Alvord L, Nelson J, Lemp J. Wetting substantivity of a new hydrogen peroxide disinfecting solution on silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Poster presented at the British Contact Lens Association 39th
  59. Clinical Conference & Exhibition, Liverpool, UK, May 29-31, 2015.
  60. Ketelson H. et al. Exploring the Science and Technology of Contact Lens Comfort. Contact Lens Spectrum. September 2011: Special Edition.
  61. Guthrie S, Dumbleton K, Jones L. Contact lens compliance: is there a relationship between care system and compliance? Contact Lens Spectrum. April 2016;31:40-43.
  62. Gabriel M, Bartell J, Walters R, et al. Biocidal efficacy of a new hydrogen peroxide contact lens care system against bacteria, fungi, and Acanthamoeba species. Optom Vis Sci. 2014; 91:E-abstract 145192
  63. Gabriel M. Antimicrobial Efficacy of multipurpose disinfecting solutions in the presence of contact lenses and lens cases. Eye & Contact Lens 2016:1-7
  64. Alcon Data on File, 2014. Cleaning Efficacy of nEOBO FID 120947A Using Image Analysis Method. Available on request.
  65. Alcon Data on File, 2014. In Vitro Cleaning Efficacy Study Using the Bicinchoninic Acid Assay. Available on request.
  66. Alcon Data on File, 2014. Stand Alone (Antimicrobial Activity) Test for Hydrogen Peroxide nEOBO Solution (FID 120947A). Available on request.
  67. Alcon Data on File, 2014. Regimen Test for Hydrogen Peroxide nEOBO Solution (FID 120947A). Available on request.
  68. Alcon Data on File. Preservative Free Position Paper. Available on request.
  69. Nichols, J. et al. The Case for Using Hydrogen Peroxide Contact Lens Care Solutions: A Review. Eye & Contact Lens. 45 (2).
  70. Wolffsohn, J., et al. CLEAR - Evidence-based contact lens practice. Elsevier. 44 (2021):368-397.
  71. Springs C. Novel Ocular Lubricant Containing an Intelligent Delivery System: Details of its Mechanism of Action. Dev Ophthalmol 2010; 45:139-147.
  72. Gabriel M et al. Effect of contact lenses and lens cases on disinfection efficacy of four multipurpose disinfection solutions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54:E-abstract 520
  73. Kern J et al. Antimicrobial properties of a novel contact lens disinfecting solution, OPTI-FREE® EverMoist®. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2011;34(Suppl 1):S30.
  74. Codling CE et al. Aspects of the antimicrobial mechanisms of action of a polyquaternium and amidoamine. J Antimicrob Chemo 2003;51:1153-58.
  75. Rosenthal RA et al. Broad spectrum antimicrobial activity of a new multi-purpose disinfecting solution. CLAO 2000;26(3):120-26.
  76. Subbaraman L et al. In Vitro Efficiency of Contact Lens Care Solutions in Removing Cholesterol Deposits from Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2013;36(Suppl 2):e41.
  77. Alcon data on file. A00962 Efficacy of Multi-Purpose Solutions in Removing Cholesterol Deposits from Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses (Penticton-L) 2012. (Available on request).
  78. Jones et al. TFOS DEWS II Management & Therapy Report. The Ocular Surface 2017: 580-634
  79. Merchea, M. et al., Hydrogen Peroxide-based Lens Care Systems Help Improve Patient Satisfaction. American Academy of Optometry, 2017.
  80. Alcon data on file 2015. Comfortable wear time (hours) is (Time Uncomfortable-Time Insertion). p-value <0.05. Baseline (Habitual MPS) and Day 30 (30 days use of CLEAR CARE PLUS) ratings for Hours of Comfortable Wear Time by Symptomatic, Habitual MPS Patients, p.5,69
  81. Lemp J and Kern J. Results from a global survey of contact lens-wearer satisfaction with OPTI-FREE® PureMoist® Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution. Clin Optom 2013;5:39-46.
  82. Kuzman T et al. A comparative study of antibacterial and antifungal efficacy of soft contact lens disinfecting solutions. Acta Clin Croat 2008;47(Suppl 1):43-48.
  83. Rosenthal RA et al. Extreme Testing of Contact Lens Disinfecting Products. Contact Lens Spectrum, July 2002.
  84. IRI Pharmacy Grocery Total CLC Chemical Brand Performance Value 26.06.22 MAT
  85. IRI Temple NZ Pharmacy Incl CWH Total CLC Value MAT 12.06.2022.
  86. Carlson E, et al. Impact of Hyaluronic Acid-Containing Artificial Tear Products on Reepitheliazation in an In Vivo Corneal Wound Model. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2018;34(4):360-364.
  87. Ogundele A. et al. Impact of Hyaluronic Acid Containing Artificial Tear Products on Re-epithelialization in an In-vivo Corneal Wound Model. TFOS Congress, Poster, 2016.

Key
pdp
Country
Honduras
User Type
All
Application
MyAlconStore